Panel to Hear Case Asking Supreme Court
to Overturn Roe
Judges Say They Won't Hear Oral Arguments in McCorvey Case
A federal appeals court has named a
judicial panel to hear arguments in McCorvey vs. Hill -- a case that
could lead to the overturning of Roe v. Wade -- but says it will not hear
oral arguments in the case.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
named three judges to hear Norma McCorvey's motion to have Roe revisited by the
U.S. Supreme Court. McCorvey -- the original plaintiff in Roe, which struck down
state laws banning abortion -- filed the motion under Rule 60, which allows
litigants to petition the court to overturn their cases based on new evidence
that was not available at the time of the original ruling.
The judges on the panel -- Judges
Edith Holland Jones, Edward Prado, and Jacques L. Wiener -- said they will base
their decision on written arguments submitted by McCorvey's attorneys, but will
not hear oral arguments. The state attorney general's office in Texas (the
defendant in Roe), is not opposing McCorvey's motion, and the appeals court has
denied a motion by a group of pro-abortion attorneys to file an amicus brief in
the case.
McCorvey's motion includes over 5,000
pages of evidence attesting to the humanity of the unborn child and the damage
abortion causes to women, including affidavits from more than 1,000 women who
say they have been harmed by abortion. The evidence also includes affidavits
submitted by the Elliot Institute documenting abortion risks.
Allan Parker of the Justice
Foundation, which is handling McCorvey's case, said he was surprised by the
court's decision not to hear oral arguments, but that he is pleased with the
judges selected for the panel and thinks they may want the case to go to the
Supreme Court.
The appeals court decided to hear
McCorvey vs. Hill after a lower court judge ruled that too much time had
passed since the original case was filed. Parker said the Supreme Court has
overturned rulings issued as long as 41 years ago, longer than the 31 years that
have passed since Roe.
Originally published in The Post-Abortion Review 12(1) Jan-March 2004.
Copyright 2004 Elliot Institute.
|