Catching Up Is Hard To Do
Life has been particularly hectic since the publication of Making Abortion
Rare in January of this year. I have done more than fifty radio interviews,
plus a television interview on NET, a leading cable station for conservative
political views.
The biggest public relations plum, so far, was a feature article in
Newsweek, March 25, page 61. This included a photo of yours truly
and profiled our efforts to promote post-abortion healing and reemphasize
the fact that pro-lifers are also pro-woman. We are also pleased that Making
Abortion Rare was chosen as a selection for the Conservative Book Club.
Of the half dozen or so printed reviews published so far, all have been
positive. I hope there will be many more reviews to come. If you have ever
published a book review, or would like to, consider writing one about Making
Abortion Rare. Even a letter to the editor about the book's proposals
will help to increase awareness of post-abortion issues. If you are still
waiting to get a copy, you can order it through your bookstores, or call
1-800-BOOKLOG. Proceeds support the Elliot Institute.
The Republican Platform
On March 20, I sent a letter to the Republican National Committee.
I encouraged the Republican Party to retain the goal of protecting unborn
children in the 1996 party platform. In addition, I suggested, the platform
should include a promise to protect the right of women to full disclosure
and their right to redress against abortionists who lie to them, injure
them, or otherwise exploit them for profit.
Such a move, I suggested, is necessary if Republicans want to help the
nation "move beyond the notion that one political party represents women
and the other represents unborn children. People of goodwill should be
concerned about both.... The time has come for the Republican Party to
develop a political position on abortion which is authentically both pro-life
and pro-woman."
Specifically, I have asked Republican leaders to work toward passage
of the Abortion Choice Act, which I have previously proposed in The
Post-Abortion Review. It reads as follows:
Women have a civil right to full disclosure of all risks, alternatives,
or other information which a patient might reasonably consider relevant
to a decision to refuse a recommendation for abortion. Full disclosure
must be given to the woman, or in the case of a minor, to the parents or
legal guardian. The State may not limit a woman's right to seek recovery
in civil court for any injuries related to induced abortion.
I have invited several pro-life groups to join me in this effort, with
some successes and several snubs. In any event, please write or call Congressman
Henry Hyde (2110 RHOB, Washington, DC, 20515-1306, (202) 225-4561), chairman
of the platform committee, and ask him to support a pro-life/pro-woman
platform along these suggested lines. You may also want to lobby your own
district or precinct representatives to the national convention.
Double Issue Accounting
I had originally thought I could fit a review of the Bobbitt case into
a normal eight page issue of The Post-Abortion Review. Unfortunately,
it turned out to take twice as much space and four times the work I had
anticipated.
Rather than try to split the material into two separate issues, I decided
it was best presented as a single issue. Because this double issue is twice
the size, it is being counted as two issues against your normal subscription
count. I hope you will agree this is fair. If not, I won't argue with you.
Just send me a note and I will credit an extra issue to your subscription.
The Jericho Plan
Our book for clergy is still moving forward. The text has been completed
for several months, but we have run into some unavoidable production delays.
I am now anticipating having printed copies available by mid-August. At
that time, orders can be placed at 1-800-BOOKLOG.
Backlogged
I don't have room or time to tell you about all the exiting projects
I have in the works. Besides, I usually like to announce our research projects
after they are done. This allows me to give you the results, and
avoids giving our opposition advance notice. Just let me say that 1997
will be our best year yet.
With no support staff, it is extremely difficult to keep all these projects
moving forward. But amazingly they do get done, bit by bit. Mostly I just
neglect my mail. (Please excuse me if one of the letters is yours.)
Please pray that we will soon have some volunteers, or better yet, the
financial resources to hire full time support staff. If you are in a position
to volunteer to work, even from your home in another state, in the areas
of public relations, grantsmanship, membership development, or fund raising,
please let me know.
Finally, since I don't have the time to bug you with donation requests
every sixty days (like fund raising experts say I should), a spontaneous
donation is always appreciated. Just don't be surprised if the check isn't
deposited for as much as six weeks. It's not that we don't need or appreciate
your support--we do! It's just that I have to squeeze bookkeeping and mail
days in between major projects.
-- David C. Reardon
Originally published in The PostAbortion Review 4(2-3) Spring &
Summer 1996. Copyright 1996 Elliot Institute
|